Burnett challenges Cuccinelli on new immigration rule

Burnett challenges Cuccinelli on new immigration rule
Burnett challenges Cuccinelli on new immigration rule
What you say to California says this: rule is arbitrary age, rule I’d, be willing to bet, and I’m not a betting man that they haven’t. Read it front to back and end and well everybody has to read it. If you’re going to file a lawsuit, you need to know what you’re filing a lawsuit on this rule is well within the boundaries of the law and the legal tradition. I mean Nancy Pelosi refer to America’s proud Heritage. Self-Sufficient is a central part of America’s proud Heritage and we proudly stand behind that tradition and enforce the 1996 law passed on a wildly bipartisan basis and signed by Bill Clinton in 1999. They started this process under the Clinton administration at, but they never introduced a rule. They said they were going to and never did, and so this is, we’ve been operating on federally dormant guidance for a long time. This rule is well within the law and very confident that will prevail in those lawsuits. This has been very thoroughly vetted and it broke records shattered records in the Department of Homeland Security for public comments. 206. 6000 +. We went to Great Lengths to respond to those comments and made significant changes to the rules based on the public input lost, as as 1327.06 thousand pages. I just want to give you an example of a situation so that you could respond to it and tell me what you think wrote in his book. By the time I went into 9th grade mother had made such strides that she received nothing except food stamps. She couldn’t have provided for us and kept up the house without that subsidy candidate member of the United States cabinet. Under your rules, an immigrant whose child could theoretically be a Ben Carson, would not be allowed to come into the United States in the first place. Benefit of welfare benefits, American citizens provide, and people coming to this country have always been expected to be able to support themselves. That is overwhelmingly continue to be supported by the American people, and that’s what this rule does and that’s all it does. Is it true that some people who do not, who are not in a position in the future to support themselves and equation would not be able to become Ben Cardin? I will never judge a case because we talked so much about the welfare benefits, but that’s only one factor: the career Immigration Services officers. We call Naya so’s. That will make these Case by case decisions. I will consider all the factors Congress told us to consider age help financial status assets, education, skills, family status as well always had to have had savings. Look worse in the point that it started, I’m just giving example cuz. I think it’s helpful for people to understand that in that situation, someone who was an immigrant legal would not would not be here right if, if this, if this rule as you have it, is enforced, you said it’s about self-sufficiency, and you say that Proud. Lady, you heard me today, you are this morning when you go to the Emma Lazarus poem on the Statue of Liberty. You said give me your tired. Your poor man can stand on his give me your tired and your poor who can stand on their own two feet and who will not become a public charge. I just played you saying it so obviously the actual poem is quite different. I’M going to read it. I was answering a question: I wasn’t: writing poetry, Aaron, don’t don’t change the fact that is very important to stand on your own two feet. A lot of people are saying that, but the pain doesn’t say that right, the poem up the party, I didn’t, bring it up I’ll answer your subs intelligent, I’m going to give you. However, it came up. You said, give me your tired and your poor. Okay, who can stand on their own two feet and will not apologize? That’S what’s right. I just played it. The poem reads: give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses need to breathe free. The Wretched refuse of the teeming Shore send these the homeless tempest-tost. To me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door. Wretched poor refuse right.. So what do you think America stands for, referring back to people coming from Europe, where they had class-based societies, where people were considered wretched if they weren’t in the right class and it was introduced, it was written one year after the First Federal public charge. Rule was written that says, and I’ll quote it. Any person unable to take care of himself without becoming a public charge on quote would be inadmissible or in the terms that my agency deals with, they can’t do what’s called adjusting status, getting a green card becoming legal permanent resident same exact time, Erin same exact time. In the year at on the Statue of Liberty, 1903, another federal law was passed. Expanding the elements of public charge by Congress. This is 8l is essential part of our heritage Haitian. They had nothing, but I am here because they were allowed in and I’m an anchor on CNN his two cousins to come here. This is a tradition that many of our fee. What is yours and mine can point to. This is not an exclusionary and toes are going to take what call the totality of the circumstances test, which is been in the test for public charge, and this will be one factor. It will be a heavily negative factor as well, just as has happened throughout America. History, I should know it all, so this doesn’t apply to any of the humanitarian Asylum, Refugee trafficking victims. None of them are covered by the charge rule okay, so I want to play for the video you’ve heard it before you’ve seen it, but but I think you can shed some light on the situation as it is the 11 year old girl, name, Magdalena right, her Father was rounded up during the immigration raids in Mississippi last week. Here is a sound bite that everyone in this country now seeing here she is Elena. Her mother got ahold of her father today about a week after that happened. Can you explain director what the crime was that her father committed it? Was it simply just being in the United States, are legally or was there anything else? Send 680 people as Sono is the short answer, but coming into this country illegally is a crime they also. So a bunch of the people – and I don’t know the numbers – that ice arrested already had removal order already been through the very long process of getting a removal order and they were disobeying them. The folks who were here illegally but had not did not have removal, orders were put in the removal process and, as I’m sure you know, Aaron about 300 of them were released that day on things on Bond and so forth for humanitarian basis. For instance, parents who are the only parent in the area to go pick up their own children in here before we go director with with the kind of consideration we talked about that ice, provided in that operation Statewide in Mississippi last important thing, though, because she’s 11 She’S, the oldest of four children and all four of them were born in the United States. Their parents came from Guatemala. So if you’re going to go ahead with your policy right now, but the policy are you going to say you’re here be here we’re going to send you home, you then up for kids right then aren’t going to go because they are American. So would you change the Constitution director so that children born to people that are in the United States illegally undocumented immigrants, US citizens, every family is going to decide when they have somebody who can’t stay in this country, where they’re going to whether they’re going to separate Their own family, or whether they’re going to stay together, that’s a decision family by family, but I hold the adults accountable in that situation and then they’re the ones you’re going to make those decisions. When a position with taxpayer sleep anymore, waiting around round about various scenarios and and of course people do but the reality is, there are bass laws in place that Congress put in place. We don’t make things up and that, frankly friend, since the one we talked about earlier on the public charge, rule we’re passing Annex on a thoroughly bipartisan basis. Back in the days when immigration was not a partisan issue and unfortunately it has become so – and there are human elements to this, and nobody denies that. But the reality is people charged with enforcing the law. Don’T get to make those decisions. Congress gets to make those decisions they’re capable of making those decisions. Frankly, we’ve asked them to make all sorts of changes to the system and they haven’t made any whether they agree with us or not in some of what the Trump Administration has requested to be fixed. Are the same things, President Obama speaking to fix?
CNN’s Erin Burnett challenges Acting US Citizenship and Immigration Services Director Ken Cuccinelli on the Trump administration’s new immigration regulation, saying her grandparents came to America with no education and that the rule would exclude people like her.

#CNN #News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *