Cyberconflict: Why the Worst Is Yet to Come | NYT News

Spread the love
Cyberconflict: Why the Worst Is Yet to Come | NYT News
Rate this post

Cyberconflict: Why the Worst Is Yet to Come | NYT News
Cyber conflict right now at this very moment, is like this airplane, the first military airplane that was ever built back in 1909, a few decades plan to be capable of destroying entire cities, cyberweapons we’re still, basically and 1909. That’S why you have to have some humility about. What’S going to happen in the world of cyber conflict, National Security, correspondent for the times and he’s writing a book about cyber conflict, one more one of the worst cyber attacks ever state-sponsored cyber attacks and how bad they could get. Yes, you should be afraid, but not for the reason you think not because somebody’s going to come in and turn off all the power between Boston and Washington. You should be worried about the far more subtle uses of sigh, for example, not an overt attack on US troops, but instead may be hacking into military health records and switching around people’s blood types. It still causes Havoc instead of full-scale War. Why? You call it the perfect weapon plus you can find you can make them just strong enough to do real damage, but not so strong that they trigger a military response. It’S cheap compared to a nuclear weapon. You just need some 20-somethings we’re good at programming, a little bit of stolen code, and maybe some red bulge keep them awake during the night. That’S why cyberweapons have only just begun to spread and cyber is the perfect weapon for a country that’s broke, and we can confirm of that. North Korea engaged in this attack hacked into Sony because of a satirical movie, starring Seth, Rogen and James Franco, light underneath the Sony Computer Center and run like hell only option was to use cyber weapons. Korea. Then you have on any given flock of New York City. Still, we wanted to know who’s the best of cyber conflict: Russia, China, Iran, they use it regularly to advance their political agendas. The Russians disrupt the Chinese, frequently the steal information, the Arabians, to show that they can reach the United States. How good or bad is the US oppose stuff among the very best at Cyber offense? The problem is that we’re good at offense we’re the most vulnerable in the defense of world, because we’ve got so many networks that form such a big Target. The United States has 6200 cyber soldiers batik behind a computer. They are sitting in military fatigues behind the computer, but the Russian hackers are the Chinese. Hackers may not be in uniform, they may be in blue jeans. They are probably sitting at the beach somewhere someplace. It’S got a really good internet connection. All this type of conflict really kicked off in 2008 State against another and it open pop the Pandora’s Box and remember it’s still only the beginning. We haven’t seen a full-blown where we don’t know what one looks like. What’S the most challenging part of a covering use of cyber is the enormous secrecy that the US government wraps around it. But we hit the point where the secrecy has actually begun to impede our ability to deter attacks, because others don’t understand what we can. What were willing to do to them and not setting any red lines out there?
Despite the devastation cyberweapons have caused around the world over the last decade, they are still in their infancy. David E. Sanger, a New York Times national security correspondent, explains why the threat is growing.

More from The New York Times Video:
Whether it’s reporting on conflicts abroad and political divisions at home, or covering the latest style trends and scientific developments, New York Times video journalists provide a revealing and unforgettable view of the world. It’s all the news that’s fit to watch.

NAN, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *