“Threat from Russia paled in comparison to China” – BBC News

Spread the love
“Threat from Russia paled in comparison to China” – BBC News
Rate this post

“Threat from Russia paled in comparison to China” – BBC News
I warned you about Chinese Espionage in the United States, active of countering intelligence threat of four nations. China is our biggest concern across a wide range of issues. Espionage is one of the larger ones with a greater threat than Russia. Yes, I think Russia has its own skill sets with his back the threat to our national security, but it pales in comparison to the nest security threat posed by China, and I would say only here in the US economic security perspective. Motorization perspective is most globally when you look at China and what their strategic plan is in Jeezy pink plan is to be the global superpower, deal politically militarily from an economic perspective, and they will achieve that any means necessary. That becomes a global issue, not just the US issue to do then. What’S it doing when it comes to carry out in trade secrets in this year, from June or July, till now, department of justice has indicted or charged 20 Chinese individuals or businesses for economic Espionage. Just since July, that is a lot and those are just the ones we know about. Those are just the ones that have been charged through the criminal court system now, but I can tell you, there’s more coming and there’s more out there. So if you just look at that moment in time, the amount of data and then when we like to do is say: okay, great, we’ve arrested Chinese students, scientist businessman, stealing on behalf of the Communist Party of China, wonderful, but what we like to look at his. What’S the damage, that’s done, what is the long-term cost to the American Tax, the research and development organizations to universities, to the businesses and the how many jobs are lost with a theft of this proprietary data entry service? That’S the long-term impact of another country. It recently, particularly on Aerospace and Aviation, getting that shows a particular interest from China or not failed again perfectly to their strategic plan elements of what they’re interested in and I would say, for any foreign intelligence services. The ability to identify an engineer, a scientist or someone of Zion us offer them free travel to China to do a presentation on University and when they get they get their cultivate them and identify some of the product and get them to coerced provide that technology. That provides your dad or treat secret to them. I think that’s tried-and-true and it, and they will continue to do that, because people are vulnerable to that and don’t understand Affairs activities when they’re asked to do so. They’Ve been reports that the use social media platforms like LinkedIn, to approach people and to try and get them to spy affected the correct, and I think their use of the social media sites like LinkedIn is prolific enter a bility to do so. My target of perspective Canon search around the globe on the site for individuals that have a particular technology is used everyday and then it could Target those. Also, we look at it from the perspective of the intelligence abilities. 30,000 e-mails, 40,000 emails and get 20 30. 40. 50, the response I had that technology I can come over and get that presentation. That’S a great question. Universities are a big part of this whole Mosaic when look at you know where a lot of the research and development is done throughout the world. It’S in the universities and colleges and research centers that are globalized right and NRA around the world know that the Chinese know that so they will put people on those positions to identify down in the emerging Technologies, but now Technologies. I think colleges, universities and research. Centers are constantly victimized by the Chinese about this. Just in u.s. weed Grant probably 350,000 students from China alone access here. The majority of those are really hard-working students to learning and be better better educated or wrong in their own families and their. What provides an amazing opportunity for the Chinese intelligence services to utilizes individuals to steal that research and development? We look at the funding that comes with those 3:45 billion dollars a year that USU cities in colleges are getting from China to have the students come here. That’S wonderful great for the, but also University is now starting to understand not in the US, but on the globe. The activities activity of intelligence services oftentimes happen on College University campuses to the Chinese market. Any concerns, I believe, riches that that might give China about this, because if you are a western Market, a western business to Western entity who is developed, something in order to be that successful down the road. You need to engage the Chinese market right, which is a huge part of the global economy, but when you do so, you need to go there fully understanding that there are risks to that. There are laws that provide China, the ability to take your data, your trade secrets are teradata your information, everything that your code for your source code that comes with anything you can put their China than owns that that is not reciprocated. Can you ice scraper in Australia? So when you look at that capability, when you go to China and go market to invest to be part of that economy, you have to go in there with your eyes wide open. That is a significant challenge. Some technology companies have gone into China. Some of the beta going into China as the Google issue, whether they’re going to be no put a search engine in China, companies are aware of the risks now of what might be involved when it comes to okay, most of them are not. I think there are companies that have a specific organizational ties, have a particular product understand that and they go their eyes wide open. But I think it’s a risk-based assessment. You have to have going to China and I think we have to do a better job and in the western civilization to say hey when you go to China, this Market, you were going to give this up just as much as you are aware of that, and I think that’s all we can really ask for when you talk about Google, Google, CEO alphabet, CEO, Hey, listen, you have to sell part of your soul when you go to China, you have to make that part of your equation. When you decide to do so, and you think people are fully – and I think when you talk about the business and things that are not Nest – security related, it’s the the dream of the American dream, a dream of Great Britain to be able to produce and sell A globally – and I think that is the sign of him – a very healthy Capital Society. Our goal is to throw a layer on that of Mass security. What does that mean in the US and Great Britain, Australia and Canada? How is that impacting our Nest? Security? My perspective is Economic Security, International Security, so they all are intertwined. We want companies in business to know is there is a risk factor when you go into China to operate a new messages think twice, because your data is going to be available to the Chinese government intelligence services for whatever they impossible. Companies do seem to be willing to censor what they do to get access to the Chinese market because with people passed because they want to sell that Goods in China, Taiwan, open hotels in China they want to make films in China will sell it to China. I was just something we want to have going forward as a global Society, where we have a major retailer here in the US have to apologize the government of China because they left Taiwan off a map of China on a shirt we have a major airline have To apologize to Chinese government because they’re so many markets for the airline because of a tweet and if you look in a major hotel brand us have to apologize to China because of mundane activity. I don’t think that is where we want to go as a global society when we have to apologize to countries Hollywood, you know to China just banned Winnie the Pooh. Well now, if you look at that, if we have screenwriters now in the US and across the world, in any capacity with his Hollywood or in the new streaming, video world have to write the screen plays with a long-term vision of selling China. That’S the that’s! The perfect metric for success by the government of China that we have self-censorship going on with the ability for people with the long-term idea that we’re going to sell this in the global market who tryna we cannot have anything anti-china in our documentary or movie or a Screenplay is very problematic. You take message. Security risk, where you have self-censorship in a free Society to be able to work and play in the global economy or in China, is very problematic to the morals and values that we build built and we live by or democratic cities in the west, extending into self-censorship Or into limiting free speech country like the us or Great Britain, self-censoring early on a business process that is at that is a model of success for China because it exported it without even having the pressure will tell him what to do. Is that are no longer being able to be marketed in China because they either have an issue with China or the predication of the show is may be negative and a china-based that’s problematic. So when you have screenwriters now writing in a script thinking about why better not say this or that or do it this way, because I won’t let us sell my video in China. That’S an amazing success for censorship. Now in the US, there is more because it’s not leaving the case in the last six months between a lot of indictments activity, the Free World, tamales, nefarious activities and economic aggression by China, not only here in the US, but on the globe.
China is the number one national security threat the US faces by far, Bill Evanina the Director of the US National Counterintelligence and Security Center told the BBC’s Security Correspondent Gordon Corera.
.
It comes amid growing pressure from Washington on Beijing and claims of economic espionage.

And Washington’s concern extends beyond espionage to the influence China is exerting (even in Hollywood)– with similar concerns in the UK.

Please subscribe HERE http://bit.ly/1rbfUog

NAN, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *